Can we apply the "Separation of Concerns" pattern?
That is keeping technical (=informative) and marketing (=manipulative)
communication apart.
Or have these two uses collapsed together in the whole of IT-world?
+1 for awesomeness ... that word was recently translated to finnish and
used as a trendy word ;-)
It seems evolution of languages is getting more and more connected.
Warning: I am soon going to file a bug in Jira about flash and url encoding
- rami
11.8.2010 1:39, Max Carlson kirjoitti:
+1 for html5 - I think it will be here for at least a year. We could
just label everything 'awesomeness' - that would be pretty funny as a
runtime radio button!
I still think ria is most descriptive but it feels like it's more
associated with Flash.
As for marketing, we need to call out our strengths, which include
html5, css3, rtl, mixins - and fresh new components!
On Aug 10, 2010, at 4:26 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote:
To me, HTML5 is just the latest hip term and does not really describe
the platform. HTML5 specifies new markup and scripting API's, but
does not specify the scripting language or CSS version does it?
On 2010-08-10, at 17:14, Sarah Allen wrote:
Anything we pick will be stale in a few years... I vote for HTML5 :)
On Aug 10, 2010, at 1:44 PM, P T Withington wrote:
On 2010-08-10, at 16:32, Raju Bitter wrote:
As an Adobe expert said: OL DHTML is the closest you can get to Flash
without using Flash, but many people don't know that fact. To me,
DHTML sounds old, ugly and out-dated.
Can we get that "on the record"?
My only fear with switching to HTML5 is that that will be stale in
a few years too.
We want a term that means just what your Adobe guy said: Flash
without Flash. What do the other popular frameworks like JQuery
call themselves? Are they still saying AJAX? Can we invent a new
term that conveys what is special about OL, and own that term, so
it can't go stale?
