Based on the google/verizon dealings, I'll go out on a limb and say google probably doesn't care much about being open anymore. They talk a mean talk, but actions speak louder than words...
On Aug 11, 2010, at 6:20 PM, Raju Bitter <[email protected]> wrote: > You'd have to ask Google or Facebook why that's the case. Or ask Chris > Messina, the Google Open Web Advocate for the past 5-6 months. Here's > the best place to ask that question: > http://groups.google.com/group/open-web-discuss > > I've had some interesting technical discussions here: > http://groups.google.com/group/openweb-group > > On Wed, Aug 11, 2010 at 4:09 PM, P T Withington <[email protected]> wrote: >> On 2010-08-11, at 07:38, Raju Bitter wrote: >> >>> That's a good point, Rami. But if you'd ask me, I'd describe >>> (technically) the "DHTML" runtime as an Open Web runtime. The idea of >>> open web is to build applications running in browsers and on devices >>> using a collection of open standards available. >>> Check the Mozilla "Demos of open web technologies" page: >>> https://developer.mozilla.org/En/Demos_of_open_web_technologies >> >> I certainly like the concept of "open web", but openweb.org, owdn.org, and >> openwebfoundation.org seem staler than openlaszlo.org? What's with that? >> >> >
