Will the IDE be open source?

I suppose it's written in Java. Do you ever plan to make Eclipse plugin?

On Nov 16, 2007 2:26 PM, bjdevlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>
> Hi folks,
>
> I'm fairly new to Laszlo, and don't like the (lack of) options for
> developing OL apps.  I've looked at several tools to see how they can
> enable
> the development of OL apps (XML editors such as Oxygen and XmlBuddy, and
> IDEs such as Emacs, NetBeans, and XCode).  None of these tools seemed to
> me
> to offer much assistance.  Given the choice of working with poor IDE
> support
> in Laszlo or using Flex, I decided to write my own IDE.
>
> The IDE will be cross-platform, and includes
>
> 1) a LZX source XML editor with outlining, automatic indentation and
> colorization, context-sensitive element/attribute suggestions, and
> pre-compilation validation warnings
> 2) a visual layout builder displaying the component relationships without
> having to compile to SWF, with drag and drop layout, and a property
> inspector for each component
> 3) an in-built web-browser to display the compiled-rendered application
> 4) VCS integration
>
> Parts 1 and 2 are complete.  Part 3 at the moment is only a wireframe
> representation of the layout, and is not editable.  No work has started on
> part 4.
>
> However, according to this bug-report
> [http://www.openlaszlo.org/jira/browse/LPP-2300] the official OL DTD has
> been out of date for at least 18 months (it represents Laszlo at version
> 2.1.2).  This is going to limit the usefulness of the IDE, since probably
> a
> significant number of elements are going to fail validation within the IDE
> and are not going to be found as options during code-completion.   In
> fact,
> since it is the DTD that drives the property palettes, if an element is
> not
> listed in the DTD there will not be a property inspector for it.
>
> I don't know if voting for OL bugs has any effect, but I know of other
> organizations with open bug-reporting who do respond to votes on bugs.  If
> you would like to see a new IDE for OL, please vote for the above bug.
> Indeed, I'm not alone in needing this updated DTD: several people have
> posted in the forum asking for an updated DTD
> (http://forum.openlaszlo.org/showthread.php?p=29210#post29210 and
> http://forum.openlaszlo.org/showthread.php?p=29506).
>
> Apologies if this is the wrong forum in which to raise something like
> this.
> Also, if there is already work underway on updating the DTD, then my
> apologies for complaining about the currently outdated DTD.   Also, I sent
> this message via nabble.com, and inadvertendly sent an earlier version.
> Luckily, since I hadn't yet subscribed to the list it looks like that
> message did not appear.  My apologies if it does subsequently appear - I
> didn't mean to spam the list on this issue.
>
> Bernard
> --
> View this message in context:
> http://www.nabble.com/new-visual-IDE-tf4821075.html#a13792659
> Sent from the OpenLaszlo - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>
>


-- 
lp,
Anže

Reply via email to