Since we're on the subject of IDE's, can anyone comment on their
experience with this?
http://www.spket.com/laszlo.html
-Rich
Benjamin Shine wrote:
Generating the DTD is a fundamentally difficult problem because the
laszlo platform lets the developer extend the DTD. One solution, for
now, is a file that Henry created, lfc.lzx:
http://svn.openlaszlo.org/openlaszlo/trunk/WEB-INF/lps/schema/lfc.lzx
Eventually, we'd like to move to generating this information from the
code itself. The js2doc tool goes part of the way to do this. I
imagine you have a source build going, to be doing the work you're
doing -- try building doc
(cd docs/src; ant users) then looking at
docs/src/build/reference/LaszloLibrary-verbose.js2doc. It will blow
your mind!
IMHO, an IDE should get information about the API and the
documentation from this file. The documentation tools that generate
the reference almost exclusively via XPath queries on
LaszloLibrary-verbose.js2doc.
-ben
On Nov 21, 2007, at 3:18 AM, bjdevlin wrote:
Hi Wayne,
I guess you are addressing this to me rather than Rich :-)
Fundamentally, the IDE is being driven by the Laszlo DTD. Hence my
request
that users of this list add their votes to the bug request to get the
DTD
updated. Unfortunately, there are still only three votes for that bug
request :-(
I also plan to have the component palettes/inspectors driven by the
DTD. I
haven't yet tackled this area. But I think that if each developer
provided
a DTD for their component along with their component code, then DTDs
could
be added to a list. I haven't looked into how difficult it is to
write a
DTD, so I don't know how practical this idea is. Furthermore,
depending on
what elements could be contained within a 3rd party component, it may be
possible to generate the DTD or even the pallette based on the component
declartion itself (i.e. if the component could NOT contain anything else
than already existed within the declaration itself, I think the DTD
could be
generated from the component itself). Anyway, as I say, I haven't
tackled
this area of the IDE yet. Maybe someone from Laszlo with more knowledge
about this could chime in?
Bernard
Epiphany wrote:
Do you think that your IDE would support the
inclusion of prebuilt components? I am thinking of a recursive
sort of
situation here where I could use your IDE to build some components that
then could later be included in your IDE. If there were a generic
facility for such a thing, the IDE could then grow quickly with very
rich
/
precanned components being added as each group/developer uses it and
contributes items to the IDE itself.
--
View this message in context:
http://www.nabble.com/new-visual-IDE-tf4821075.html#a13875231
Sent from the OpenLaszlo - User mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
