If you've got a small test case that you could file a bug in JIRA with, that would help a lot in tracking down any regressions. Remember, one test case is worth a thousand bug reports.
On Fri, Jun 25, 2010 at 11:47 AM, Ryan M <[email protected]> wrote: > Well, have about 73 compiled in resources but they aren't large images. It > may be a moot point as I'm seeing some compilation stability issues with 4.8 > and datapaths. Could be back to 4.0.16 for us. > > > On 6/25/2010 9:52 AM, Raju Bitter wrote: > >> Ryan, do you compile a lot of resources into the SWF file? I've been >> working on Flex projects where we had a lot of resources compiled into >> the app, and the compilation could take up to 3-4 minutes. Generally >> the Flex compiler is much slower than the OpenLaszlo compiler for the >> SWF8 runtime. I've heard of Flex projects with compile times going to >> up 8 minutes. >> >> - Raju >> >> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 5:52 PM, Henry Minsky<[email protected]> >> wrote: >> >> >>> It's definitely going to be slower to compile swf10, because we're doing >>> some preprocessing and then invoking the flex compiler. I'd like to >>> figure >>> out where the time is going, at the least how much is being spent in the >>> flex compiler vs the LZX phase. >>> >>> One thing that we hope will speed things up a lot is using .lzo library >>> files, to precompile >>> a bunch of an app that doesn't change much. >>> >>> I've just been working on "platform-native" library compilation, it's >>> working somewhat now in trunk, and should be fully operational soon. That >>> builds native flex ".swc" libraries from >>> lzx libraries, which should cut the compile time significantly. >>> >>> On Thu, Jun 24, 2010 at 11:36 AM, Ryan M<[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> >>>> In relation to the compile time differences, I wanted to give you guys >>>> some specifics. Using 4.8.0 I have listed the compile times below. >>>> >>>> swf8 - 48s >>>> swf10 - 2m 11s >>>> >>>> This is the reason why I would even be concerned about the compile >>>> times. >>>> 48s is workable but that's only if I use swf8 for development and then >>>> compile to swf10 for deployment. That seems a bit impractical to me >>>> though. >>>> Any feedback would be appreciated. >>>> >>>> Ryan M >>>> >>>> >>> >>> >>> -- >>> Henry Minsky >>> Software Architect >>> [email protected] >>> >>> >>> >>> >>> >> >> > -- Henry Minsky Software Architect [email protected]
