[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
You have no understanding of the Arkansas law upon which this decsion was
based. Judge Wright's decision has been praised by those who support it,
but more impotantly it has been acknowledged as correct by those who
understand the law.
Bill
On Thu, 2 Apr 1998 19:00:32 -0500 (EST) [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>
>
>Hi Jackie,
>
>If you agree that Judge Wright's decision was correctly rendered, you
>have
>to agree with the premise. You can, of course, agree with the
>decision and
>damn the reasoning but that is entirely different. Judge Wright's
>decision
>has been praised rather than damned by those who support it.
>
>Judge Wright decided that conduct described by Paula Jones was not
>outrageous. She did not decide whether it was true or not and
>prevented any
>such finding.
>
>Your arguments about the evidence of Clinton's conduct are beside the
>point.
>If Judge Wright's decision stands, no court will ever hear the
>evidence
>because it was only naughty but not an actionable tort.
>
>
>>Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>>
>>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>>
>>> Hi Jackie,
>>>
>>> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge
>Wright based
>>> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male
>employer
>>> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it
>does not
>>> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable
>tort. That
>>> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what
>an
>>> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
>>>
>>> Do you agree?
>>> Best, Terry
>>>
>>
>>Hi Terry
>>
>>ROTF--agree to a silly statement like that. You must be kidding,
>right!!
>She read
>>all the material and Paula's lawyers did not provide enough evidence.
> Why
>is it
>>that if a judge doesn't render a decision favorable to what people's
>biases
>are,
>>then he/she didn't do the job right. If it had gone the other way,
>these same
>>people would be saying "what a great judge." But of course, I am
>still
>trying to
>>figure out how he blocked the door with his arm across it and still
>manged
>to get
>>his hands up her culottes to grab her?? All that acrobatic gyrations
>ole
>Bill was
>>going through and she never moved?? But she passed a lie
>detector--LOL.
>>
>>jackief
>>
>>> "Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's
>Dictionary
>>>
>>> Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>> In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>>
>>
>>
>>--
>>In the sociology room the children learn
>>that even dreams are colored by your perspective
>>
>>I toss and turn all night. Theresa Burns, "The Sociology Room"
>>
>>
>>
>>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>>
>>
>Best, Terry
>
>"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
>
>
>
>
>Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
>In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
>
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
