Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
As far as I know there is no legit reason for assault weapons.
Certainly not for hunting.
In LA the sergeants (cops) had to get special permission to carry M-16
A2 Service rifles because they were outgunned by the bad guys.
There is also a special unit of the SWAT team that has these, but can
only use them with permission from higher ups.
Of course a lot of the bad guys already have them, and no permission is
needed for them to use them. <TIC>
Sue
Sue
> Hi Bill
>
> I know that there are good arguments on both sides of the camp on this
> issue. I grew up with guns in the house all my life and my girls were taught
> gun safety and the whole works. I shoot although not the greatest and Ed is
> a target shooter. Of course, we do not have children in the house and our
> dobes are a pretty good protection system against them getting stolen. We
> have a number of LE friends who Ed shoots with and I enjoy the outings. So
> it would be difficult for me, personally, to support the banning of guns even
> though I see they do have some valid points and see how often guns are so
> readily available for those who shouldn't have guns. The assault weapons are
> something else entirely though--this IMO should not even be manufactured.
>
> jackief
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
