Jackie Fellows <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Sue Hartigan wrote:
> Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> Hi Jackie:
>
> As far as I know there is no legit reason for assault weapons.
> Certainly not for hunting.
>
> In LA the sergeants (cops) had to get special permission to carry M-16
> A2 Service rifles because they were outgunned by the bad guys.
>
> There is also a special unit of the SWAT team that has these, but can
> only use them with permission from higher ups.
>
> Of course a lot of the bad guys already have them, and no permission is
> needed for them to use them. <TIC>
>
> Sue
>
> Hi Sue
I couldn't think of any legitimate reason for them to be made either--except war I
guess. I do know that obtaining a gun legitimately here is not an easy task to
do. They do have the time to run a thorough background check, which unfortunately
may not be feasible in a large city. Gosh, when we moved here, we had to have the
background check redone in order to have the target pistols.
BTW--finished the book and will try and get it off next week. Did you want it sent
to you or someone else?? I truly enjoyed the book. Thanks a million.,
jackief
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
