Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Bill:
The person who authored the sexual harassment law was on MSNBC last
night. It was explained that the law has nothing to do actually with
sex, it is about employment.
After explaining that even though a person can be a pig in the work
place as long as it does not hurt the other persons job in any way it is
not against the law. Of course there is the emotional pain that can be
caused, but the law itself has to do with employment, not sex. Anyway
that was the way it was explained by the author.
Sue
> Hi Jackie,
>
> I read an interesting story in this morning's paper that made an
> excellent poin about this case. Simply put, many people just do not know
> the law with respect to sexual harassment and what is required to prove
> it. In spite of the red herrings that disappointed people throw out, it
> has nothing to do with an action that may or may not be considered an
> outrage. Clearly, even if Judge Wright thought the actions, if conducted
> as alleged, were an outrage, the case STILL would not have met the
> minimum for sexual harassment.
>
> People should not be coming down on Judge Wright for following the law.
> If they are not happy, they should work to get the law changed.
>
> Bill
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
