[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
On Thu, 02 Apr 1998 08:22:12 -0500 moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>
>
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> >moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>
>> >[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> >
>> >> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>> >>
>> >> Hi Jackie,
>> >>
>> >> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge
>Wright based
>> >> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male
>employer
>> >> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss
>it does not
>> >> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable
>tort. That
>> >> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes
>what an
>> >> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
>> >>
>> >> Do you agree?
>> >>
>> >
>> >Mornin' Terry,
>> > I think you need to read the decision.
>> >...Mac
>>
>> Hi Mac,
>>
>> Here I will read it to you. This is extracted from the decision:
>>
>> "In addressing the issues in this case, the Court has viewed the
>record in the
>> light most favorable to the plaintiff and given her the benefit of
>all
>> reasonable factual inferences, which is required at this stage of
>the
>> proceedings."
>> Best, Terry
>>
>
>Mornin',
> That does nothing to support your claim. There is nothing in her
>decision that warrants
>
>a charge of prejudice.
>...Mac
>
>HI Mac,
Wow, that was sure a short decision that Terry posted. Surely Judge
Wright said more than that..... :)
Bill
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
