[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>moonshine <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>
>> [EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>>
>> Hi Jackie,
>>
>> Good Judge Wright did not base her decision on the law. Judge Wright based
>> her decision on her own prejudices. She believes that a male employer
>> showing his manhood to a female employee and telling her to kiss it does not
>> constitute conduct outrageous enough to constitute an actionable tort. That
>> is what she said in her decision. The law in no way describes what an
>> outrageous act is. Judge Wright determined that.
>>
>> Do you agree?
>>
>
>Mornin' Terry,
> I think you need to read the decision.
>...Mac
Hi Mac,
Here I will read it to you. This is extracted from the decision:
"In addressing the issues in this case, the Court has viewed the record in the
light most favorable to the plaintiff and given her the benefit of all
reasonable factual inferences, which is required at this stage of the
proceedings."
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
