Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Jackie:
I didn't read the story. I have it here but just haven't had the time,
but will tonight.
I don't think that anything should have been released to the public
about these kids. I especially don't think that their pictures should
have been put on the front of the magazines. Sure enough some kid is
going to see that and think he can become "famous" if he tries something
like this. Hope to God I'm wrong about that one. :(
Sue
>
> Hi Sue
>
> I guess the parents and grandparents have decided the best thing to do under the
> circumstances is be truthful about the incident. Did you read Newsweek--Tom said
> he was mentioned in there. He was awfully embarrassed after everything mushroomed
> like it did. Of course, there are two versions to the sexual story.
>
> I know the records are supposed to be sealed but I would imagine there are
> provisions that allow them to be opened. I know if you commit a felony in our
> state at a very young age, it can be reduced to a misdemeanor and sealed, but if
> you get in trouble again it is opened and is used as a felony in sentencing you
> (or something like that).
>
> jackief
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
