"Ronald Helm" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >And I agree, but it just won't happen. Not until they get money, >status, race, sex, etc out of the equation and put what should be looked >at only into the trial. Which is the crime. > >Sue Maybe they should try the crime against Defendant X, with no mention of the defendant's name, race, religion, age, sex. State vs. "Defendant who beheaded his neighbor lady". I like that. Ron 99 percent of lawyers give the rest a bad name. [EMAIL PROTECTED] Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Kathy E
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Viola Provenzano
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year o... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds DocCec
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan