DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: In a message dated 98-04-20 11:50:43 EDT, you write: << What would happen with his bill, is that the 11 year old would be tried and given the DP, but the sentence would not be carried out until the child reached 17. >> What's the rationale for waiting, Sue? Did he say? I don't see much sense in doing that. (Of course, I'm anti-DP for starters, but even if I weren't I doubt I'd see the point of waiting six years. Doc Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
- Parental responsibility was Re: L&... Kathy E
- Re: Parental responsibility was ... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Viola Provenzano
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Kathy E
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Viola Provenzano
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year o... Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds DocCec
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds William J. Foristal
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Ronald Helm
- Re: L&I DP for 11 year olds Sue Hartigan
