DocCec <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:


In a message dated 98-04-20 11:50:43 EDT, you write:

<< What would happen with his bill, is that the 11 year old would be tried
 and given the DP, but the sentence would not be carried out until the
 child reached 17. >>

What's the rationale for waiting, Sue?  Did he say?  I don't see much sense in
doing that.  (Of course, I'm anti-DP for starters, but even if I weren't I
doubt I'd see the point of waiting six years.
Doc

Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues

Reply via email to