Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc:
The whole idea doesn't really make any sense to me. However he said
that time would be long enough for any appeals, etc. That was the only
reason I heard. Maybe Sooz heard more.
My idea is that it would be next to impossible for the public to agree
to having an eleven year old hooked up to the IV's, or in the chair.
The sight of that would turn any pro death person around, IMO. I can't
even begin to imagine a 7-9 year old in the position.
This isn't just an idea that this guy has either, he actually has a bill
pending, and 65% of the people are on his side.
Sue
> What's the rationale for waiting, Sue? Did he say? I don't see much sense in
> doing that. (Of course, I'm anti-DP for starters, but even if I weren't I
> doubt I'd see the point of waiting six years.
> Doc
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
