[EMAIL PROTECTED] (William J. Foristal) writes:
Hi Sue,
Starr won't be able to do this, IMO. If Clinton decides to fight the
subpoena it would take months before the courts decided the issue on
whether he should be forced to testify. More likely is that Starr's
people will work with Clinton's people to come to an agreement as to the
terms of his testifying before the Grand Jury. And for sure Lewinsky
will go first. Which brings us back to the contention by Ginsberg that
Starr offered her full immunity and should honor that agreement. This
could take months to sort out anyway.
Bill
On Thu, 12 Mar 1998 10:40:24 -0800 Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
writes:
>Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
>
>Hi Bill:
>
>I just read yesterday that the offer from Pepperdine is still open to
>Starr any time he wants to take advantage of it.
>
>I also heard this morning that the investigation is coming to a close,
>and right now they are trying to get Clinton to testify before the
>Grand
>Jury. The question did come up as to whether or not they could or
>would
>subpoena him.
>
>IMO, Clinton has kept his mouth shut about this whole thing (smart
>thing
>to do IMO) until he hears what Monica has to say about the whole deal.
>
>So I think (and I could be very wrong about this) that Starr will get
>Clinton before the grand jury first, get his testimony, and then call
>Monica and get hers. That could prove to be really bad for Clinton,
>and
>I think that is why Starr would do it that way.
>
>Sue
_____________________________________________________________________
You don't need to buy Internet access to use free Internet e-mail.
Get completely free e-mail from Juno at http://www.juno.com
Or call Juno at (800) 654-JUNO [654-5866]
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
