[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes:
>Kathy E <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>[EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
>> I can't say but I suspect you haven't visited most divorce courts, Kathy.
<VBG>
>
>Wrong. I have.
That's a lot of divorce courts.
>> Oddly it seems the womens' rights movement has greatly worsened the position
>> of women in divorce court. Greatly superior finances more likely in the
>> hands of the husband would surely allow the husband in many cases to
>> overcome the natural advantage that women still possess IMO. That would be
>> the exception rather than the rule. If anyone has any statistics to refute
>> that I would be interested in hearing them and would be quite frankly
shocked.
>
>Well since your the one that has decided that every news show that says
>the opposite is wrong, please show me where you came up with your
>information, I am truly interested, national statistics do show that
>after a divorce the women is in a lot worse shape than the man even if
>he gets the children, economically the women suffers more than the man.
>Also your looking at child custody cases as they used to be not as they
>are now. I'll wait for your statistics to back up what you say.
Done. Here's an irrefutable statistic:
In every divorce I have personally known where there was a real contest the
wife still got the kids - unless there was the horrible joint custody.
I know of not one news show that says the man usually gets the kids.
Economic realities mirror society.
Best, Terry
"Lawyer - one trained to circumvent the law" - The Devil's Dictionary
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
