Sue Hartigan <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
Hi Doc:
I can relate to that. :(
One thing that California has done, which I think is great for both
parties. (My son is involved with this) The minute the support amount
is awarded it starts coming out of the paycheck before the person even
sees it.
The reason I think this works best for the person paying the support, is
that he/she no longer has to deal with anyone. If the money doesn't get
to the child it is then between the court and the employer, and the
person recieving the support.
Both parties win in this situation, IMO. The child is guaranteed
support, and the person paying doesn't have to deal with anyone
regarding if he paid it or not.
Sue
>
> And then doesn't always get it, Sue. I went through that. My ex simply
> refused to pay, and since he was out of state I had to go to court and get
> judgments, which he blithely ignored, then get his wages garnisheed, after
> which he just changed jobs and the whole thing had to start again. Of course
> each court date meant I lost a day's pay, so it soon became not worth the
> hassle.
> Doc
--
Two rules in life:
1. Don't tell people everything you know.
2.
Subscribe/Unsubscribe, email: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
In the body of the message enter: subscribe/unsubscribe law-issues
