On Monday 02 of April 2012 10:00:19 Hans-Peter Diettrich wrote: > [email protected] schrieb: > > Hi all, > > As I've already mentioned few weeks ago on lazdevel, today we branched > > 1.0 :) > > > > branch is here: > > http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_1_0/ > > What's the update policy? I just updated examples/fpdocmanager, do I > have to update the new branch, too? If so, what's the suggested > procedure for updates that should go into both the branch(es) and trunk?
No, just add which revisions need to be merged to fixes_1_0 here http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch > > Which FPC version is suggested/assumed for 1.x? > > > wiki with revisions which have to be merged from trunk (also there will > > be links about other 1.0 stuff like changes etc): > > http://wiki.lazarus.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch > > or > > http://wiki.freepascal.org/Lazarus_1.0_fixes_branch > > What's the difference (in content)? no difference, both addresses point to the same page. > > > Current trunk version 0.9.31 is 1.1 as of r36507. > > > > 1.In next days snapshots will be versioned as 1.1 > > 2.For testers: > > svn co http://svn.freepascal.org/svn/lazarus/branches/fixes_1_0 lazarus > > 3.We are planning to release 1.0 in next 3 months, but before that we > > will relese 1..XX RC candidates - you'll be informed about it. > > > > Happy Lazarus 1.0 ! > > What's the future of dragging in 1.0? Will fixes (workarounds) be added > to make the dockable IDE work? By conditional compilation, at least? Don't know ... you should ask Paul or Mattias about it. zeljko
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
