On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
Michael Van Canneyt wrote:
On Tue, 4 Feb 2014, Mark Morgan Lloyd wrote:
But complicated information like statistics or information of 20 cameras,
needs time to be processed by the brain in order to react on it. There is
therefor no need to have it refreshed in intervals that the brain cannot
discern anyway. What could possibly be achieved with displaying information
of 20 cameras at 60 FPS ? Nothing, unless you want to brag about your
hardware.
I'm afraid that's... highly questionable. The more video streams (etc.) that
are visible the smoother you want the overall presentation to be: the human
brain is /very/ sensitive to small timing differences.
Yes. I don't argue with that.
In addition, there are
standards for e.g. flashing indicators in safety-critical applications which
are specified with much finer resolution than 100 mSec.
So a 10Hz update is totally out of the question these days: 100Hz would be
more realistic.
I would be very interested to see experiments proving that this will make an
actual difference in human operator efficiency.
If something is that time critical, I would not leave it to a human operator to
begin with :)
Michael.
--
_______________________________________________
Lazarus mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
