> On Oct 17, 2014, at 8:01, Giuliano Colla <[email protected]> wrote: > > > Il 17/10/2014 12:52, Reinier Olislagers ha scritto: >>> On 17/10/2014 12:50, Giuliano Colla wrote: >>> Il 17/10/2014 12:21, Reinier Olislagers ha scritto: >>>>> On 17/10/2014 12:16, Mattias Gaertner wrote: >>>>> On Fri, 17 Oct 2014 11:58:21 +0200 >>>>> Reinier Olislagers <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Googling gives lot of pages saying that cannot is more formal than >>>>> can't. And MS Word prefers cannot over can not. >> >> If you have better references, as I said, I'm very interested! > [edited for brevity] ... > misinterpreted. Being "can't" very frequent in my e-mails (they usually ask > for features which either can't be done for free, or can't be done at all), I > draw from my direct experience the conclusion that "can't" does not possibly > "slow down comprehension" as Microsoft geniuses claim. > > Giuliano > >
How about throwing your hands up in exasperation and just use "aint" (which IOS wanted to correct to ain't - which isn't [is not] as funny) Seriously though, in my technical writing class, contractions were discouraged as standard fare. If you had several of the base words (like a lot of cannot, should not, I would), the first occurrence would be expanded, and each successive one in the paragraph you use the contraction. As far as a dialog box for a program, I'd use the expanded base words. -Chris -------- Everything at or below the line is a signature, not to be confuse with the body of the email above. Sorry about the last signature text that seemed to have some people questioning my sanity. We are what we repeatedly do. Excellence, then, is not an act, but a habit. -Aristotle
-- _______________________________________________ Lazarus mailing list [email protected] http://lists.lazarus.freepascal.org/mailman/listinfo/lazarus
