Did you try your experiment with any of the other slightly more expensive CMM's (Adobe, Microsoft's)? I've not noticed any huge discrepancies before and I would imagine that there is reasonable pressure on both those vendors to keep the code tight.
On Mar 24, 2005, at 1:03 PM, Dirk Str�ker wrote:
Hi,
we work with littleCMS and are very happy about the results. But besides the
color quality I'm interested in the performance. We measured a calculation
time of around 400 ms using a 1 Mega Pixel picture. Knowing the calculations
that have to be done I wonder if the performance is the best possible. I'm
just interested if there will be some potential for performance optimization
and does anyone has experience with other CMMs regarding the calculation
time?
With regards
Dirk
-------------------------------------------------------
SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide
Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users.
Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now.
http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_id=6595&alloc_id=14396&op=click
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
------------------------------------------------------- SF email is sponsored by - The IT Product Guide Read honest & candid reviews on hundreds of IT Products from real users. Discover which products truly live up to the hype. Start reading now. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_ide95&alloc_id396&op=click _______________________________________________ Lcms-user mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user
