On Monday 20 June 2005 06:05 pm, Bob Friesenhahn wrote:
> On Mon, 20 Jun 2005, Hal V Engel wrote:
> >> You are saying that your scanner acts like a spectrophotometer?  I
> >> find it difficult to believe that using LEDs in the scanner causes it
> >> to not suffer from metamerism.
> >
> > No I am saying that IF the amount and direction of the color shift caused
> > by metamerism are the same for both the IT8.7 calibration chart and the
> > printer target then metamerism in no longer a significant issue.  LED
> > scanners seem
>
> Ahhh, but metamerism still exists!  Metamerism due to different ink
> will be elminated but there may still be metamerism which causes the
> scanner to think that two colors are very similar when they are
> actually not.
>
> Bob

Yes when the calibration chart and the printer target have different inks or 
colorants then the only question is the magnitude of the difference.  If it 
is very small (like with an LED scanner) then the profile can be very good.  
But if it is large than the profile is very bad.  

If both the calibration chart and the printer target use the same inks then 
both will have almost exactly the same metamerism characteristics since in 
the scanner both will be lighted by the same light source and imaged using 
the same sensor and if scanned in the same pass, like they are in 
ProfilePrism, scanned with the same scanning parameters.  Under those 
conditions if two colors on the two charts appear to the scanner to be the 
same color then they are extremely close to the same color.  That was the 
whole point behind having both use the same inks.  It almost totally 
eliminates one vary large variable.  

Of course it can not totally eliminate it since the calibration chart and the 
printer target will very likely be on different papers.  But the light 
source, sensor and ink are no longer variables and have instead been 
transformed into constants.  The only remaining variable that can influence 
metamerism is, in your words, "the properties of what is being scanned" which 
in this case is the media that the calibration chart and printer target are 
printed on.  If the media are different (highly likely) then there will still 
be a very slight difference in the metamerism characteristics of the 
calibration chart and the printer target.  But my experience is that the same 
ink printed on different media will have almost exactly the same metamerism 
characteristics - the ink formulation accounts for at least 90% of the 
metamerism characteristic.  In addition my experience is that the difference 
between the same inks on different media is less if the media are similar.  
That is the metamerism characteristics of a given ink will be almost 
identical if both media are glossy or both are mat.  The ideal setup would be 
to have the calibration chart printed on the exact same media as will be used 
in the printer and if possible on the same type of printer.  This would 
result in the calibration chart having exactly the same metamerism 
characteristics as the printer target. 

Again the real issue is how to minimize the affects of metamerism on a scanner 
based printer profiling process.  If the calbration chart and the printer 
target have nearly the same metamerism characteristics, no matter how much 
metamerism actually takes place, metamerism's impact on the profiling process 
has been minimized. 

I should add that although I think that ink specific calibration charts would 
be helpful to those using scanners to profile printers I do not think that 
there is anything other than an extremely low probability that these will 
ever become available.  So how useful these may be is likely a mote point. 

Hal


-------------------------------------------------------
SF.Net email is sponsored by: Discover Easy Linux Migration Strategies
from IBM. Find simple to follow Roadmaps, straightforward articles,
informative Webcasts and more! Get everything you need to get up to
speed, fast. http://ads.osdn.com/?ad_idt77&alloc_id492&op=click
_______________________________________________
Lcms-user mailing list
Lcms-user@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/lcms-user

Reply via email to