Andrew Hoying, 2001-07-17 08:36 -0600
>I guess by making these packages available for download, the LEAF 
>project's various LRP variants are technically a distribution. We don't, 
>however, have anyone at the present time auditing the variety of packages 
>now available for LRP variants from a variety of sources on the web. 
>Perhaps we need to create a document stating what is and isn't acceptable 
>as redistributable package, I.E. only debian packages and their upgrades, 
>etc. Personally I see LRP as a great resource for allowing people to build 
>thin servers to do exactly what they need them to do, and as such I would 
>like to make as many of these kinds of tools available to people as possible.

Andrew,
In the spirit of being as inclusive as possible, I'd like us to allow 
developers to create whatever packages/images etc. that they feel will help 
the project. However, we can't go against the original developers wishes, 
and violate his/her chosen licence.

Has anyone contacted DJB? He may be willing to make an exception for the 
LEAF project, or even create packages himself.

--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/


_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to