On Tue, 17 Jul 2001, David Douthitt wrote: > That wouldn't take that much. I've recompiled almost everything at > least once. Next step is to create a LRP directory which contains > everything, including options used to compile, etc. Then a diff file > would be created, so that a generic package could be patched for LRP, > then the package could be created quite easily - and the options changed > if wanted. One thing I would like to see is easy and consitent features to mirror LEAF work. I was wondering why Oxygen has multiple core bin files. :-) Ultimately, I would like to be able to rsync one or two of the core LEAF projects, plus the other addon packages. Dale. _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) jdnewmil
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Jack Coates
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Jack Coates
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Dale Long
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
- RE: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Andrew Hoying
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) Mike Noyes
- Re: [Leaf-devel] Licensing (specifically, djb) David Douthitt
