> Andrew,
> Good question. I think that is a good idea. Rick started doing this very
> thing for David's Oxygen packages, but he was unable to keep up with
> David's production.
Thank you.
> Does anyone have a better idea? If there are no objections, text files in
> the format specified below should accompany packages.
>
> packagename.lrp.version.txt
One other question, how are we going to resolve package name disputes, like
two different versions of the same package? Should we create an archive
subfolder for old versions? Or a glibc2.1 subfolder for the new development
work David is doing? Or we could even include version information after the
package.lrp like package.lrp.version but that could certainly be confusing
to people when they are trying to load them onto their floppies...
Andrew Hoying
> --
> Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
> http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Leaf-devel mailing list
> [EMAIL PROTECTED]
> http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
