Andrew Hoying, 2001-07-18 09:02 -0600
>One other question, how are we going to resolve package name disputes,
>like two different versions of the same package? Should we create an
>archive subfolder for old versions? Or a glibc2.1 subfolder for the new
>development work David is doing? Or we could even include version
>information after the package.lrp like package.lrp.version but that could
>certainly be confusing to people when they are trying to load them onto
>their floppies...
Andrew,
All good questions, without answers at this time. I expect we'll be able to
generate a consensus in the next couple of months that will make most of us
happy. With the package permissions set to 664 we'll be able to move
packages around. Eventually we will arrive at a directory tree that we can
use for CVS too.
Expect things to be bumpy at first and keep local backups of your packages.
I suggest that prior to scp of a new package to /pub/packages check to make
sure there are no name conflicts. If there are, post a message to this list.
--
Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
http://leaf.sourceforge.net/
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
http://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
