Well put!
I know that I have not been vocal in the past month, I have been overloaded with a
rush project at work, and my Wife has taken to Zope, so between these, I have had
little time for LEAF. This does not mean that I am less interested. :-)
Your post is right on track. One thing I would sugest, just repeating a few
sugestions made by others a month or so ago, since we are realy talking about two
things, the sh-httpd and the Weblet/configuration piece, we need to keep
distinguishing between them. A good messege subject line might be "Web Config -
Weblet/Configurator" and "Web Config - sh-httpd".
Richard Amerman
-----Original Message-----
From: Erich Titl [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]]
Sent: Fri 8/30/2002 2:12 PM
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Cc:
Subject: [leaf-devel] Webbased configuration
Hi folks
Thanks for the hearty welcome
I did a bit of a fly by on all the summaries presented lately on the
Webbased config subject. I would like to make a few suggestions, not
necessarily technical ones because I feel the matter has been well understood.
- Could we keep this on leaf-devel, it makes it easier to concentrate if I
don't have 2 lists to watch?.
- Could we agree to a common subject line, my procmail mail sorter is a lot
happier that way? I suggest to keep 'Webbased configuration' in the
subject for mail recognition.
- My current work is on a Java based Web application which was badly
designed, we are not in a hurry, lets try to get a good pattern for the
configurator.
- I believe we should try to build this with the currently available tools
in Dachstein/Bering, e.g. sh-httpd. Even if it eats a few cycles, it has a
miraculously small footprint.
- Let's try to build the configurator in a modular way, someone on the list
suggested to build kind of plugin to a generic configuration webpage which
would have to be implementd in each package. I think this is an excellent
idea and we should try to write specs for the interface. The developers and
maintainers of the current distributions/packages will certainly be the
most valuable resource.
- Can we build up a small subtree in the CVS structure for the
configuration tool which can be accessed by everyone just for development
purposes. A start could be the POST sh-httpd so we would not have to ask
for copies explicitly. Suggestions for the structure please. This could
help as a coordination point for our efforts.
Thanks for comments, improvements and critics.
It's late east of Greenwich, good night.
Erich
THINK
Püntenstrasse 39
8143 Stallikon
mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
PGP Fingerprint: BC9A 25BC 3954 3BC8 C024 8D8A B7D4 FF9D 05B8 0A16
-------------------------------------------------------
This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old
cell phone? Get a new here for FREE!
https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=urceforge1&refcode1=3390
_______________________________________________
Leaf-devel mailing list
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
^){([58y W\zYiZ!zQHm?
0zaxr).ǟ ַr^7 yzx%Kyz+-.ǟ alb,y+b?+-wW}ׯz
