On Fri, 2002-08-30 at 14:12, Erich Titl wrote: > - Let's try to build the configurator in a modular way, someone on the list > suggested to build kind of plugin to a generic configuration webpage which > would have to be implementd in each package. I think this is an excellent > idea and we should try to write specs for the interface. The developers and > maintainers of the current distributions/packages will certainly be the > most valuable resource.
Everyone, If we're considering a change to our .lrp package structure, I strongly suggest an evaluation of "udeb" for the new format. This would allow us to piggyback off of Debian installer package development. They already have udpkg, netcfg, niccfg, busybox, ash, etc. They even have a stripped down apt-get called anna. modules.txt http://cvs.debian.org/debian-installer/doc/ http://ftp.debian.org/debian/dists/sid/main/debian-installer/binary-i386/Packages > - Can we build up a small subtree in the CVS structure for the > configuration tool which can be accessed by everyone just for development > purposes. A start could be the POST sh-httpd so we would not have to ask > for copies explicitly. Suggestions for the structure please. This could > help as a coordination point for our efforts. Erich, Agreed. I propose the creation of a config tree in our CVS src tree. All of the components necessary for this project can be placed there, and write access granted to team members. The structure of the config tree is left to the team members discretion. Example: leaf/src/config + | /core | /text | /ncurses | /web | /doc -- Mike Noyes <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ http://leaf-project.org/ ------------------------------------------------------- This sf.net email is sponsored by: OSDN - Tired of that same old cell phone? Get a new here for FREE! https://www.inphonic.com/r.asp?r=sourceforge1&refcode1=vs3390 _______________________________________________ Leaf-devel mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
