Hello Mike, Can you tell us what your intentions are? By reading your comments it seems like you are trying to force the creation of new branches.
<snip> >> We don't want to loose the modular design we have now. Not being able >> to backup the initramfs for example is not a very nice thing. > > Agreed. However, GNAP is much closer to a true embedded design. > Why? > >> I think we may be loosing too much time discussing stuff with little or >> no result... The central DB design comes to my mind for example... > > I in no way think discussion is a wast of time. It's where ideas come > from, and synergy is generated. > Agree with that, but I don't think that's what Luis meant ;) >> So, unless someone has a good small footprint design using the latest >> available techologies, providing the same capabilities we have now, lets >> leave the matter for now. > > I've said this before, but it seems it's time to mention it again. > > > Evolution as a project development model may not work for the community > anymore. If the community wishes to move to a monolithic development model, > I'll step aside. > I don't think anyone here is wishing to move to a monolithic development model. Why are you saying that? Eric ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
