-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- Hash: SHA1 [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote:
| Hello Charles, | |> I'm all for modular. Not being able to (easily) backup the initramfs |> image is (in my opinion) not a serious problem, assuming the boot process |> changes as well. I envision the initramfs as containing only that code |> required to build a root filesystem image, or roughly incorperating the |> functionality of the existing /linuxrc script. | | Like Martin I'm also a bit puzzled here. Are you saying that it should be | possible to remove the modules needed for mounting the boot device from | the initramfs and put them elsewhere? The modules required to talk to any devices the initramfs system is reading from (ie: containging LEAF.cfg and any LRP packages) would still need to be either compiled into the kernel or added to the initramfs image. - -- Charles Steinkuehler [EMAIL PROTECTED] -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE----- Version: GnuPG v1.4.0 (MingW32) Comment: Using GnuPG with Mozilla - http://enigmail.mozdev.org iD8DBQFDDbEfLywbqEHdNFwRAo1AAKDpMg33H1pfOAGUExcFVYwuGPuO8wCgrJ2/ DmShL8kS8UYpz+R6fgXXUPE= =vq1u -----END PGP SIGNATURE----- ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
