Am Mittwoch, 29. September 2010, 20:44:11 schrieb davidMbrooke:
> On Wed, 2010-09-29 at 19:57 +0200, Martin Hejl wrote:
> > Hi kp,
> > 
> > > (btw: the issue started with DavidMBrookes question, if sources should
> > > go into cvs or not? The discussion drifted away - any ideas on that
> > > topic?)
> 
> Yes, this was all *my* fault; I was hoping people had forgotten... :-)

I'm sorry to remind an ancient post :)

> > I'd say yes - it will be easier that way to provide a source tarball
> > (whatever that has to include remains to be seen) if it's decided we
> > need to, but maybe more importantly, buildtool will not break if the
> > location of a source changes upstream. As a bonus, it makes it easier to
> > build things offline - just make a cvs checkout of the whole src path,
> > and everything needed for building the toolchain and packages is right
> > there and can be built without internet access.
> 
> Personally I agree. On balance it seems best to "snapshot" the upstream
> sources in our CVS and only refer to our CVS for source downloads.
> 
> > I just don't know how happy SF will be, if we put tons of (additional)
> > binaries in CVS.
> 
> The 2.6 Kernel source is about 70MB and that's the biggest upstream we
> have. If we provide a downloadable (outside CVS) full source snapshot
> for every formal binary release (4.0, 4.1 etc.) those will be much
> bigger but not that frequent. I don't think that's too bad, but then I
> don't have to pay SF's hosting bills...

There will be another 70MB for buildenv (mainly gcc, binutils and uclibc).

I haven't checked the sources, but AFAIK linux, buildenv and shorewall are the 
only sources left, staying outside of our repository.

I agree that having everything in a snapshot can be useful.

kp


------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances
and start using them to simplify application deployment and
accelerate your shift to cloud computing.
http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev

_______________________________________________
leaf-devel mailing list
leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel

Reply via email to