On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 18:35 +0200, Martin Hejl wrote: -snip- > We also have the requirement (per Sourceforge terms of use) to provide > the sources for a binary release in the FRS (which we currently don't > do, since according to the link Mike provided, having those sources in > CVS is not sufficient).
Martin, I believe creating a source tarball of the development tree (similar to what Dave (LRP) & Matt (Eiger) did in the past) used to create our releases should fulfill our SF FRS requirement. This statement is true only if source for all generated packages are included in the generated source tarball. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
