On Thu, 2010-09-30 at 14:20 +0300, Andrew wrote: > On 29/09/10 23:04, KP Kirchdoerfer wrote: > > I haven't checked the sources, but AFAIK linux, buildenv and shorewall are > > the > > only sources left, staying outside of our repository. > > > > I agree that having everything in a snapshot can be useful. -snip- > What is reason of this? Kernel, gcc, binutils, and some other packages > can be downloaded in any time - because they are always present on > servers, and probability that they were removed/moved is negligible; and > it's size is enough large.
Andrew, Do we distribute gcc? If not, we're not responsible for maintaining source code. As a micro/embedded linux distribution, kernel, distributed packages, etc. must have source for binaries distributed in the SF FRS. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
