On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 13:56 +0300, Andrew wrote: > 01.10.2010 13:01, Martin Hejl пишет: > > Am 01.10.2010 11:38, schrieb Andrew: > >>> So, looking for a different SCM, might be interesting (and > >>> possibly/probably provide benefits) - but it doesn't address the issue > >>> that we're not providing sources for binary releases in FRS. > >> > >> Source availability requirements are applicable for all versioning > >> systems, or only for CVS? > > > > The page only mentions CVS, but I would assume that this applies to all > > other versioning systems as well.
Martin, As far as I know, your assumption is correct. > > I think their point is - source for binary releases must be in FRS. > > Having it somewhere other than in FRS is not sufficient to meet that > > requirement. This is my understanding also. > On that page it's mentioned 'FRS or other project resources' - so IMHO > at least it'll be good to ask about this to SF support - will > git/svn/etc snapshot meet source availability requirements. I'll talk with SF staff next week. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
