Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2010, 17:27:31 schrieb Mike Noyes: > On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 19:08 +0300, Andrew wrote: > > 01.10.2010 17:52, Mike Noyes пишет: > > > Andrew, > > > I'll bring this up with SF staff next week, and get a definitive answer > > > for us. > > > > Thanks. Can you ask also about such constantly-available sources like > > kernel, gcc and other same heavy-weight tarballs? > > Andrew, > Per SF Staff; although not technically correct, omitting these > 'constantly-available' sources shouldn't create problems.
Mike; thx for clarification. It will be just a very small amount of packages that we have to take care of (uclibc, shorewall, ?). With the (cvs) source tarball being sufficient, it's no big deal to be inline with the SF requirements. kp ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Virtualization is moving to the mainstream and overtaking non-virtualized environment for deploying applications. Does it make network security easier or more difficult to achieve? Read this whitepaper to separate the two and get a better understanding. http://p.sf.net/sfu/hp-phase2-d2d _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
