On Fri, 2010-10-01 at 12:38 +0300, Andrew wrote: > 30.09.2010 19:35, Martin Hejl пишет: > > So, looking for a different SCM, might be interesting (and > > possibly/probably provide benefits) - but it doesn't address the issue > > that we're not providing sources for binary releases in FRS. > > Source availability requirements are applicable for all versioning > systems, or only for CVS? > > It's said in rules that "SourceForge.net requires that source code > releases be made via our File Release System for any binary releases > made via our File Release System *or any other project resource* . The > presence of matching source code within CVS does not meet our source > availability requirements. " - and it's right position, because deleted > files from CVS becomes unavailable at all - instead of other versioning > systems, where deleted files are still available addressing to earlier > commits.
Andrew, I'll bring this up with SF staff next week, and get a definitive answer for us. -- Mike Noyes <mhnoyes at users.sourceforge.net> http://sourceforge.net/users/mhnoyes/ SF.net Projects: leaf, sourceforge/sitedocs ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Start uncovering the many advantages of virtual appliances and start using them to simplify application deployment and accelerate your shift to cloud computing. http://p.sf.net/sfu/novell-sfdev2dev _______________________________________________ leaf-devel mailing list leaf-devel@lists.sourceforge.net https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/leaf-devel
