In message <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>, Greg Hennessy writes: >> Is Anybody else more inclined than Rob to attemt to get a compromise >> prorposal wedged in instead of the current proposal ? > >I'm not sure it is possible to do so. There has been an announcement >of a leap second on 31 Dec 2005, and a sugguestion of no more leap >seconds after that. I suspect we have to wait to find out the results >of the current proposal, which I suspect will be that too many people >object to the idea of no more leap seconds, and that for the next few >years at least, we will continue with the current system.
Why don't you think we can put an alternative proposal on WP7A's table while the other one is there too ? -- Poul-Henning Kamp | UNIX since Zilog Zeus 3.20 [EMAIL PROTECTED] | TCP/IP since RFC 956 FreeBSD committer | BSD since 4.3-tahoe Never attribute to malice what can adequately be explained by incompetence.
