>Everything important in CeroWrt long ago made it upstream - the apu2 (which, >btw, I have been using as my main test platform for the make-wifi-fast work) >has BQL on the intel network drivers Interesting, it didn't seem like it's implemented when I test as suggested by https://www.bufferbloat.net/projects/cerowrt/wiki/Tests_for_Bufferbloat/ See http://imgur.com/a/U36zU It spikes when the download test starts, it stops peaking little over halfway through the download test, unless that indicates it is indeed working and I'm misreading the results?
> (http://blog.cerowrt.org/post/real_results/ more detail here: > https://blog.tohojo.dk/2016/06/fixing-the-wifi-performance-anomaly-on-ath9k.html). Excellent information, thank you! Especially as most APU2 owners would run ath9k with some using ath10k. > dnsmasq-dnssec is an optional package in lede as are the sqm-scripts, > luci-app-sqm, and the bcp38 support. I've fallen behind the curve (thanks pfsense), I wasn't aware of the bcp38 RFC. Cheers! >What never made it to openwrt from cerowrt was: >A) the controversial "rename the devices to reflect the security model" >portion of the firewall code. That code allowed for never having to reload the >firewall as it used a pattern match on the device name to dynamically add >devices to a secure or guest zone. I didn't fancy this concept when I read it myself. > I look forward to migrating my apu2s to lede soon! All the APU2 owners look forward to it :) _______________________________________________ Lede-dev mailing list Lede-dev@lists.infradead.org http://lists.infradead.org/mailman/listinfo/lede-dev
