A balance command mentioning those two accounts would sum to the amount you 
want:

   ledger bal assets.checking liabilities:unprocessed

Michael

> On 4 Feb 2016, at 15:50, David Glasser <[email protected]> wrote:
> 
> One downside to doing it this way is that before you enter the check
> clearing transaction, Assets:Checking does not actually answer the question
> "how much can I take out of my checking account without bouncing a check",
> which surely is a very important use case.
> 
> --dave
> 
> On Feb 3, 2016 8:30 PM, "Michael Norrish" <[email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> One way to do two-stage cheques would be something like
> 
> 2016/1/25 * My Favourite Shop
>   Expenses:Groceries   $100
>   Liabilities:Unprocessed Checks
> 
> 2016/1/31 * Check clearing
>   Liabilities:Unprocessed Checks  $100
>   Assets:Checking Account
> 
> You could assuredly add metadata to link the two transactions to be wrt some 
> check #.
> 
> Michael
> 
> > On 4 Feb 2016, at 15:26, John Hendy <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >
> > On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:07 PM, Martin Blais <[email protected] 
> > <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >> On Tue, Feb 2, 2016 at 10:48 PM, John Hendy <[email protected] 
> >> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>
> >>> On Monday, February 1, 2016 at 10:41:26 PM UTC-6, Martin Blais wrote:
> >>>>
> >>>> On Mon, Feb 1, 2016 at 1:13 PM, John Hendy <[email protected] 
> >>>> <mailto:[email protected]>> wrote:
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Greetings,
> >>>>>
> >
> > [snip]
> >
> >>>
> >>>
> >>> Huh. Yes, I'll definitely have to look into the emacs mode. I assumed once
> >>> it was in ledger format it would be *a lot* harder to navigate around vs.
> >>> just doing it while it's already in a spreadsheet format.
> >>
> >>
> >> Definitely not, text is there for your pleasure. You typically organize 
> >> your
> >> Ledger input file in the order that makes the most sense for you (minus 
> >> some
> >> constraints: Ledger will report the transactions in the order they appear 
> >> in
> >> the file and the balance assertions are computed as such. Beancount sorts
> >> everything by date so order doesn't matter).
> >
> >
> > So, using the demo.ledger file as an example, if I run `convert` on my
> > downloaded bank file, I'm going to get something like this:
> >
> > 2010/12/01 * Checking balance
> >  Expenses:Unknown                        $1,000.00
> >  Equity:Unknown
> >
> > 2010/12/20 * Organic Co-op
> >  Expenses:Unknown             $ 37.50  ; [=2011/01/01]
> >  Equity:Unknown                   $ -225.00
> >
> > 2011/01/02 Grocery Store
> >  Expenses:Unknown             $ 65.00
> >  Equity:Unknown
> >
> > Would you just go through that and manually change all of those
> > categories in ledger-mode? I still like starting from the bank .csv,
> > as it's got transaction ids and the amounts already in there... all I
> > need to do is add categories. It appears that `convert` defaults to
> > the above. As this is the primary thing of interest to me, I was sort
> > of surprised that ledger mode offered no pop-up minibuffer to edit the
> > account, at least from perusing the manual page. I only see options
> > for reconciling, reports, changing an amount, etc.
> >
> > In any case, `convert` got most of my stuff into ledger format and
> > ledger-mode at least recognizes the blocks, so I'll likely just start
> > from there. I still have *a lot* more reading to do... for example:
> >
> > - I noticed in the demo file, the co-op (which I snipped above)
> > purchases were in one chunk vs. treated as separate transactions. I
> > wouldn't default to this and am guessing it's just a preference thing
> > (compared to having one transaction per payment)?
> >
> > - I still wrestle with deposits and withdrawals. Am I the payee? Is my
> > bank? Does it matter as long as some assets category goes positive and
> > another negative?
> >
> > - I'd love tracking checks *as we write them* vs. just waiting for
> > them to appear. This used to really annoy me in Moneydance, as I'd go
> > through the checkbook once a month to see what was written but not
> > come through. Then I'd have to have these little note entries along
> > the way to remind me what the total of uncashed checks were to-date so
> > that the sums added up. I bet there was a better way in Moneydance I'd
> > missed, and I'm positive there's one in ledger/beancount.
> >
> > Anyway, still taking it slow but feel like I'm starting to get to a
> > usable noob state.
> >
> >
> > Thanks,
> > John
> >
> > --
> >
> > ---
> > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> > "Ledger" group.
> > To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> > email to [email protected] 
> > <mailto:ledger-cli%[email protected]>.
> > For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> > <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> --
> 
> ---
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ledger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:ledger-cli%[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.
> 
> -- 
> 
> --- 
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
> "Ledger" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an 
> email to [email protected] 
> <mailto:[email protected]>.
> For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout 
> <https://groups.google.com/d/optout>.

-- 

--- 
You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups 
"Ledger" group.
To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email 
to [email protected].
For more options, visit https://groups.google.com/d/optout.

Reply via email to