Hi,
On 05/17/2016 04:17 PM, Erik Huelsmann wrote:
Hi Raido,
...
Ok. Well, I hope this discussion help us become your best choice for
the next 6 years (or more)!
Yes, seems that way. Btw, I forgot to thank you for your job done with
ledgersmb. Thank you!
We have tried also commercial bookkeeping software, but ware not
able to afford any yet. I have tried to migrate to 1.3 also
several times, but have not managed.
That's pretty unfortunate. Have you tried getting in contact with
other users to get your problems resolved, like you have now? If not,
maybe we can help you get your migration issues resolved this time (to
1.4, that is)? I'd be really interested in helping you out, because we
really need real-world data (lots of it!) to test the migration
programs. Unfortunately, we have only (very) limited amounts.
...
Would you mind me helping you get the migration done? It'd be for
free, but it might take me a while: I'd like to test the 1.2 migration
programs with your data and improve them in such a way that your data
can be migrated. That way, everybody benefits. Lets get in contact
off-list to discuss the details (your data won't need to leave your VM
for this, but I would need access to it).
I have not contacted anyone before. I really did not expect to get such
an active response to my problems. I'd be happy to let you help me to
migrate to 1.4. I'll contact in private when I have access to you ready.
...
You are right. But as I am doing bookkeeping myself, I am not so
much worried about fraud :).
Right :-) But the tax authorities still might: you could be sending
out an invoice at a certain amount, get paid in cash, then edit the
invoice to be at a lower amount and not file the remaining amount.
That's good for you, but bad for the tax man, because now your
counterparty has nicely high deductions, while your administration has
low payments. This too counts as fraud, I'm affraid, a type of fraud
that benefits the owner of the company -- so, not *internal* fraud
where usually the owner of the company is kind-of the "victim". Not
implying you're using the transaction editing for this, of course!
In case of very small companies bookkeeping solution is probably not an
evidence for tax authorities anyway. Original documents and tax reports
are. But I got your point.
...
Ok. As you proposed above yourself, I can fully agree to implementing
the reports to allow in- or excluding the reverse-related
transactions. I think that should solve it.
Yes, that should do.
May I ask what your native language is? (I can't tell by the extension
on your e-mail: .eu) I'm asking because translations exist for
LedgerSMB. Not all translations are complete yet, but the site hosting
the translation access
Transifex(https://www.transifex.com/ledgersmb/ledgersmb/) can help
find translators. Maybe that helps, or maybe you can find a few other
users from the same language who together want to sponsor a translator?
I am estonian. I got translations (not sure ware those from 1.4 version
or some earlier), but the translation is done for probably less than
half of the program. To make my life easier I have improved translation
using text editor directly in et.po file. I probably will not sponsor
translator and I also do not have friends who would use ledgersmb, but I
might be willing to translate some part of the program (or at least make
my suggestions).
Some things would be much easier if I would know which button to
press :).
Well, I personally find the English you're using to mail this list
just fine, so, don't hesitate to mail this list with your questions.
I'll do my best to find the answers, as long as the questions are
about using the program (I can't answer any accounting questions, I'm
affraid).
Be careful with your words. I may start asking questions, but I might
not finish :), but I try to get all the information from ledgersmb web
page before I start asking. This may take some time. For example the
drafting-reporting system is confusing. I remember in some cases the
drafts ware not included in reports, but without reports I can not
verify is my source data correct. But do not try to answer now. I will
ask when I know what I want to know.
Raido
--
Bye,
Erik.
http://efficito.com <http://efficito.com/> -- Hosted accounting and ERP.
Robust and Flexible. No vendor lock-in.
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Mobile security can be enabling, not merely restricting. Employees who
bring their own devices (BYOD) to work are irked by the imposition of MDM
restrictions. Mobile Device Manager Plus allows you to control only the
apps on BYO-devices by containerizing them, leaving personal data untouched!
https://ad.doubleclick.net/ddm/clk/304595813;131938128;j
_______________________________________________
Ledger-smb-users mailing list
Ledger-smb-users@lists.sourceforge.net
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/ledger-smb-users
