I thought there were so many decisions for the ref to make yesterday it was inevitable that he would annoy one of the two teams. Also it didn't help the number of times players from both sides feigned injury and tried to get opposition players booked. I think we had 4 alleged deliberate elbows and numerous calls for free kicks and penalties - take Becchio's two pitiful attempts late on to try and get something for nothing. The ref didn't buy it and in general he kept his cards in his pocket except for the obvious incidents like when McCartney pulled back a Pompey player. In general I thought he did ok , there was an extraordinary number of free kicks. If anything I thought his linesman were poor and didn't help him at all.
Sent from my iPhone On 29 Dec 2010, at 12:58, Ian Murray <[email protected]> wrote: > Missed kick off for this as the traffic was atrocious. Just shows the > potential we have in the good times to attract a proper crowd. > > Agree with Rich W's match report on pretty much every level. It was barn door > obvious we would concede an equaliser in this game or worse. Collins has to > be dropped - simply not good enough. Bromby/Bruce next time please. > > On that, I understand that dodgy 'Arry has said he will be loaning Woodgate > out in Jan. I know you should never go back but by God could we do with a > firing Jonathan Woodgate at the back! > > Haven't heard officially but understand Kilkenny has made the cut for the > Australian squad and we now lose him for 5 weeks so he can go take the p!ss > out of some part time non-entities in Qatar. Quite apart from the fact that > this is more proof of FIFAs ineptitude, we will SERIOUSLY miss Kilkenny. > Yesterday showed how crucial he is to the team. Worryingly, he still hasn't > signed a new deal. > > The only thing I don't agree with Rich on is the ref. I can say without irony > that he was the worst ref I have ever seen. He got pretty much every decision > wrong and had clealry made his mind up before the match not to give us > ANYTHING. He was that bad I would be completely unsurprised if he was > actually on the make. > > Sent from my iPhone > > On 29 Dec 2010, at 12:00, [email protected] wrote: > >> Send Leedslist mailing list submissions to >> [email protected] >> >> To subscribe or unsubscribe via the World Wide Web, visit >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> or, via email, send a message with subject or body 'help' to >> [email protected] >> >> You can reach the person managing the list at >> [email protected] >> >> When replying, please edit your Subject line so it is more specific >> than "Re: Contents of Leedslist digest..." >> >> >> Today's Topics: >> >> 1. Re: non LU cricket chant (Jim Moran) >> 2. Re: non LU cricket chant (Damian Walsh) >> 3. Re: non LU cricket chant (Andy Clayton) >> 4. Re: Portsmouth and others (Peter Cass) >> 5. Re: 3 -3 thriller - chuff (Richard Walker) >> 6. Re: Pompey (DAVID NATTAN) >> >> >> ---------------------------------------------------------------------- >> >> Message: 1 >> Date: Tue, 28 Dec 2010 23:51:43 +0000 >> From: Jim Moran <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected] >> Cc: leedslist <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Cost fewer than Berbatov it is. :) >> >> (I know) >> >> On 28 December 2010 23:50, Ed Morrish <[email protected]> wrote: >>> That's awful. It should be *fewer*. >>> >>> Ed. >>> >>> On 28 Dec 2010 23:49, "Jim Moran" <[email protected]> wrote: >>>> Mitchell Johnson, Mitchell Johnson. Cost less than Berbatov and takes >>>> less wickets. >>>> >>>> On 28 December 2010 23:40, Damian Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: >>>>> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary >>>>> chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is? >>>>> >>>>> Damian >>>>> _______________________________________________ >>>>> Leedslist mailing list >>>>> Info and options: >>>>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>>>> >>>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >>>>> >>>> _______________________________________________ >>>> Leedslist mailing list >>>> Info and options: >>>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>>> >>>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >>> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 2 >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:56:20 +0100 >> From: Damian Walsh <[email protected]> >> To: leedslist <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant >> Message-ID: >> <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=ISO-8859-1 >> >> Thanks - Damian >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 3 >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 00:01:03 +0000 >> From: Andy Clayton <[email protected]> >> To: Damian Walsh <[email protected]> >> Cc: leedslist <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] non LU cricket chant >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> 'He bowls to the left, he bowls to the right but Mitchell Johnson's bowling >> is shite >> >> >> >> On 28 Dec 2010, at 23:40, Damian Walsh <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Listening to TMS, I'm intrigued by the reference to the "uncomplimentary >>> chant about Johnson". Anyone know what it is? >>> >>> Damian >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 4 >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 12:55:08 +1100 >> From: "Peter Cass" <[email protected]> >> To: "DAVID NATTAN" <[email protected]>, "list leedslist" >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] Portsmouth and others >> Message-ID: <8bbc3a33ecfb4b50a0dd14220ca7f...@casspc> >> Content-Type: text/plain; format=flowed; charset="iso-8859-1"; >> reply-type=original >> >> Games like these are the reason why we will, at best, end up in a play-off >> spot. As a rule we have done well against good teams in this league >> (Baaadiff excepted) but we keep dropping "bankers" time and time again >> against lower, less skilled teams >> >> Its not just this season either - last season, and quite prob the one before >> that as well, we dropped points to teams who were playing with the postman >> in goals and passing Scandanavian tourists as a front 2 >> >> We should be BURYING these chump sides - Its the one thing I dont see with >> Grayson - its that killer instinct that says "pfft - get out of my way and >> stop pretending your on my level" We should be recording some 4-0 wins some >> 3-0 wins hell even the odd pants'ing of sides, but no we cant do that as we >> dont have that killer instinct >> >> (Also would help if we weren't shyte at defending, but that arguments >> already in full flow) >> >> Pete C (t'other one) >> >> Anyone seen Pete C (the orriginal?) shed load of floods around where he used >> to be >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 5 >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 08:52:01 +0000 >> From: Richard Walker <[email protected]> >> To: Jim Moran <[email protected]> >> Cc: "[email protected]" <[email protected]>, DAVID DOWDEN >> <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] 3 -3 thriller - chuff >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii >> >> I heard a fan moaning with one of the officials that the East Stand Upper >> should have been opened. Their argument was that tickets for the Pompey >> match only started to sell after the QPR match and it takes weeks to get >> permission to open the new stand. Surely Bates should have been planning for >> the stand to be open. Maybe he was too busy ? >> >> Sent from my iPhone >> >> On 28 Dec 2010, at 20:09, Jim Moran <[email protected]> wrote: >> >>> Because he has to sell it out to cover policing and staff costs, probably. >>> >>> On 28 Dec 2010, at 20:04, DAVID DOWDEN <[email protected]> wrote: >>> >>> why Bates will not open East Stand upper -turned away quite a few folk >>> today. >>>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> Leedslist mailing list >>> Info and options: >>> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >>> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >>> >>> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> Message: 6 >> Date: Wed, 29 Dec 2010 11:53:29 +0000 (GMT) >> From: DAVID NATTAN <[email protected]> >> To: [email protected], Richard Walker <[email protected]> >> Subject: Re: [LU] Pompey >> Message-ID: <[email protected]> >> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 >> >> Rich said >> McCormack ? 7. Very lively throughout. Dave N was worried about his pace but >> I >> think he showed some excellent bursts of speed to get himself into good >> positions. Played more advanced in the second half and looked dangerous. I >> don't >> think he suited a midfield role in the first half, he's an out and out >> striker. >> ? >> To be fair RIch,that assessment was based on one incident in a previous game >> when it looked like he was through on goal but checked back instead of >> taking it on in the same way as Max or Beckford would have done. - I did >> take that comment back when I saw the incident again on LUTV and saw that >> the opponant was in fact in front of him and not alongisde.I have been very >> impressed with McCormack in the glimpses we have had (olus watching a couple >> of reserves games on LUTV) and would like to see him partnered with Somma, >> although it is hard to criticise our attack this season given the number of >> goals we have scored. >> As for the Pompey fan - John Westwood - I have met him on a couple of >> occasions abroad with? England - once in a fountain near Marseilles and then >> in a pub the following day since he knew of the lads I was with, and >> he?seemed a?decent lad - an antique book seller by trade though god knows >> what his new customers think when they see his tattooed face and body ! >> Dave >> ? >> >> >> >> >> ------------------------------ >> >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: >> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER >> >> >> End of Leedslist Digest, Vol 6, Issue 77 >> **************************************** >> > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: > http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
