Sorry pal but I was talking about the benefits of us having a written constitution and being a Republic. Dunno how this became a party political debate about economics! You shouldn't assume I'm a labour supporter (I am, but you shouldn't assume!).
:-) Sent from my iPhone On 4 May 2011, at 10:16, uu "Mark Humphries" <[email protected]> wrote: > And Labour's plan to reduce the deficit wouldn't be called "slash and burn"? > How different was their plan? > > But anyway, your analogy about lancing the boil fits very well with the > structural deficit plans over 4, not 5 years. One could argue that Labours > idea to delay the "slash and burn" by 1 year before the general election > was > politically driven, but the fact remains > all 3 major parties were committed > to major spending cuts before the election, the only difference was the > timing of and depth of the initial cuts. > > I don't blame you for your selective memory on this, Milliband suffers the > same :-) > > > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
