Completely agree. We need constitutional protection like the United States. 

Sent from my iPhone

On 3 Jul 2011, at 21:57, Damian Walsh <[email protected]> wrote:

> No apologies for the non LU content - (there's bugger all to talk about
> anyway at the moment)
> 
> I see she that someone has just got a police caution for making online
> remarks about Simon Cowell's organisation and the "talent" that he finds.
> 
> There's lots of things to say about both the "loser TV" that makes Simon
> Cowell and others very rich, but I'm posting more about the free-speech
> aspect of this. I think that there are very tough libel and slander laws in
> the UK, so much so that people come from all over the world to sue because
> the playing field isn't entirely level. So why does Simon Cowell need a
> new(ish) criminal act to protect his reputation? Why do governments pander
> to these people. Pander? Pander! is anyone suggesting that in a different
> context a Simon Cowell would have a criminal record himself?
> 
> This is wrong.
> 
> Damian
> _______________________________________________
> Leedslist mailing list
> Info and options: 
> http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
> To unsubscribe, email [email protected]
> 
> MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)
> 
_______________________________________________
Leedslist mailing list
Info and options: http://mailman-new.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist
To unsubscribe, email [email protected]

MARCHING ON TOGETHER (There's it)

Reply via email to