People go to tesco to buy food. It is a food retailer and the best at what it does. Its success as a food retailer has enabled it to diversify and sell everything else. It wasn't the case that the food side of the business wasn't doing well so the board decided to diversify income streams and sell fucking insurance to make up the difference, was it?
We will never agree on this. You never answered my question? Is it because it's a no Mark? Sent from my iPhone On 19 Jan 2012, at 13:55, [email protected] wrote: > > >>> In other words - it wasn't the first place you'd go for any of the above > and why it failed.<< > > > So nothing to do with the legacy overheads of hundreds of high street > stores when your rivals are all out of town, with cheaper rents, where the > customers are? > > If only everything was as simple as the way you see things. > > Have you been to a Tesco recently? They sell everything that you used to be > able to buy in Woolies, plus food. So by your argument, Woolies wasn't > diversified enough! > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate > _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] PETE CASS (1962 - 2011) Rest In Peace Mate
