Morning Eric, I like the analogy but I think you might be in a stronger position if you hadn't used the word 'reckon' ;o)
Cheers Chris On 5 Jun 2013, at 07:58, "Eric B" <[email protected]> wrote: > well we didnt make the claim that X exists. The burden of proof is on the > "accuser". Otherwise I could call you X and you have to you re not X? > hardly fair init.. > > On top of that, if I was to use YOUR approach: I reckon I saw superman and > batman shag in my backyard. Can you prove me wrong? > I ve got plenty of comics to show for their existence. > > fucking hell.. lets keep this real ey? > > Eric > > > On Wed, Jun 5, 2013 at 2:46 AM, Rick Duniec <[email protected]> wrote: > >>> The pope finally admit that Christians should speak the truth, but >> forgets to mention that atheists always have >> >> Atheists ? How the hell do they know any better than the Christians ? Is >> there more or less proof or is it exactly the same on both sides ? >> Perhaps you mean agnostics - but hardly anybody knows what that really >> means anyway. >> _______________________________________________ >> Leedslist mailing list >> Info and options: >> http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist >> To unsubscribe, email [email protected] >> >> MARCHING ON TOGETHER > _______________________________________________ > Leedslist mailing list > Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist > To unsubscribe, email [email protected] > > MARCHING ON TOGETHER _______________________________________________ Leedslist mailing list Info and options: http://mailman.greennet.org.uk/mailman/listinfo/leedslist To unsubscribe, email [email protected] MARCHING ON TOGETHER
