Mike, that is a pretty narrow argument. Sure, some people have dial-up
or no Internet at all, and some are running Win3.1, have small discs,
and on and on. We all live with some economic trade offs. But it's
2010 and the norm for computer users is a fairly fast computer and
some sort of high speed IN. You can't expect to design for the lowest
common denominator. Some of the best features of Legacy pretty much
require a fast IN and we'd all be outraged if Legacy had not kept up
with the technology. (How about a snail mail LUG for those without any
 Internet?)  We even allow discussion of clever Access functions and
very few Legacy users are up for that.

But I think the real point isn't  the cost of an extra email, it's the
need that some people feel to "enforce" the rules, as they perceive
them, on everyone else. We've heard many times that this is an
unfriendly LUG, intimidating people and generally causing bad
feelings. I think we'd do better to give a little leeway to our fellow
Legacy users, many of whom are obviously new to Legacy or the LUG (and
may not even know about the archives.)   Sending a test message when
you are not sure if you are getting through to the group seems like a
pretty innocuous thing to do.

I think Millenia itself should do a better job of keeping people on
topic and enforcing the rules...if they feel the need... and
discourage the users from doing that. The LUG could then be a
friendlier place and more useful to ALL users.

(Guess I was bored today...my longest rant ever.)

Dick



Legacy User Group guidelines:

   http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp

Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/

Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:

   http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/

Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp

To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp



Reply via email to