While I agree with Jerry's general suggestion ("keep master sources more broad,
just not too broad"), I draw the line differently.
I *do* keep my Master Source for US census records at the county, not the
state, level. Makes for a lot less work fiddling with details, *and* helps me
see at a glance when I look at my source list what records I've looked at in a
county, since that is the primary jurisdiction for most records in most US
states.
I don't want to re-start the "splitting" vs. "lumping" sources debate except to
let Cheryl and any other new users know that is a decision you will want to
make before you get too far down the road using Legacy.
Connie
Legacy User Group guidelines:
http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp
Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009:
http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/
Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp
To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
