While I agree with Jerry's general suggestion ("keep master sources more broad, just not too broad"), I draw the line differently.
I *do* keep my Master Source for US census records at the county, not the state, level. Makes for a lot less work fiddling with details, *and* helps me see at a glance when I look at my source list what records I've looked at in a county, since that is the primary jurisdiction for most records in most US states. I don't want to re-start the "splitting" vs. "lumping" sources debate except to let Cheryl and any other new users know that is a decision you will want to make before you get too far down the road using Legacy. Connie Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergroup@legacyusers.com/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/legacyusergr...@legacyfamilytree.com/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp