That is the LDS current method. But data input years ago, may not have had as precise input plan. Countries, states and others did what they wanted. That is why LDS is redoing everything (eventually) Rich in LA CA
--- On Tue, 1/18/11, Eliz Hanebury <[email protected]> wrote: > From: Eliz Hanebury <[email protected]> > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] It's official - Legacy 7.5 is now available > To: [email protected] > Date: Tuesday, January 18, 2011, 3:11 PM > They do each record twice and then it > goes to an arbitrator. I have > family where the year changed by 3 seemingly at random. > > Eliz > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 6:01 PM, Jennifer Crockett > <[email protected]> > wrote: > > Well it doesn't give me much faith that any of the > records can be taken at face value. Instead of a mad rush to > index everything, surely cross checking, or having at least > one other person verify correct recording should have taken > place. If the image was available it wouldn't matter so > much. > > > > Regards, > > > > Jennifer > > http://colston-wenck.com > > > > -----Original Message----- > > From: Eliz Hanebury [mailto:[email protected]] > > Sent: Wednesday, 19 January 2011 9:47 AM > > To: [email protected] > > Subject: Re: [LegacyUG] It's official - Legacy 7.5 is > now available > > > > I have to say, the errors are often of the people > giving and taking > > down information. There is currently no way to correct > errors, they > > [Support at familysearch] say some day there will be, > but they are > > concentrating on making a site that will work. > > > > > > Eliz > > > > On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 5:44 PM, Jennifer Crockett > > <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> I am not LDS. I have accessed one of the new > collections recently and found errors. What can one do about > this? See below. The bride's date of birth should be 6 July > 1837 not 6 Dec 1837. The place of marriage was not Karby, > but Redsted. I know this from the online Danish Archives > which show original images. I verified the correct details > with the image of the marriage record and the death record > for Else Anderson. > >> > >> Denmark Marriages, 1635-1916 > >> > >> Groom's Name: Peter Villadsen > >> Groom's Age: 24 > >> Bride's Name: Else Andersen > >> Bride's Birth Date: 06 Dec 1837 > >> Bride's Age: 29 > >> Marriage Date: 12 Oct 1866 > >> Marriage Place: Karby, Thisted, Denmark > >> > >> Indexing Project (Batch) Number: M01212-8 > >> System Origin: Denmark-EASy > >> Source Film Number: 410117 > >> Reference Number: 5-185-6 > >> > >> There was no image associated with this LDS > record. I just want to warn people that not all these types > of records are error free. > >> > >> Regards, > >> > >> Jennifer > > > > > > > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. > 21 2009: > > > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > > > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > > > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > > > > > > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 > 2009: > > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > > > > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
