Yes I went over it with a fine toothcomb. As for the release, that was to the room..anyone?
On 1 June 2011 02:20, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > Charlotte, > > From the description of the change in the source citation between the > Assigned Sources screen and the report it does seem possible that the report > parameters need resetting. The only other possibility I can think of is that > there is a difference between the Repository Detail, although I assume that > you took a look at all aspects of the source. > > Sorry, but I’m not privy as to when an update may be released (as far as I > know the programmers keep this absolutely to themselves!). > > Ron Ferguson > http://www.fergys.co.uk/ > > > *From:* Charlotte Box <[email protected]> > *Sent:* Wednesday, June 01, 2011 1:54 AM > *To:* [email protected] > *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] > > Yes reading back it was a bit confusing :-) what I was trying to get across > is that on the 'Assigned Sources' page, the two mentions of the same source > are identical whereas on the 'Individual report' the citations are > different. Hence why it seemed a contradiction. No.7 is complete, but No.8 > is missing the tail-end of the citation. I checked the source and the source > detail for both and they match exactly with none of the wording missing. > It's all a bit strange. I think what I'm going to do reset like you > suggested and if that doesn't do the trick I will delete both sources and > re-input them and see if I get the same problem. I'm pretty convinced it's > something I'm doing but I can't see what yet.. Thanks for the help Ron btw, > much appreciated. > > I am aware of the scrunched lines, is there a provisional date for the new > release? > > Charlotte > > On 1 June 2011 00:24, Ron Ferguson <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Charlotte, >> >> I tested using the Individual Report. I don’t usually add a source to my >> AKA’s so I copied a birth source for my test using the option on the >> Assigned Sources Screen. Both sources were numbered ‘1’ with only the one >> source description at the bottom of the page – this being the option >> selected. In other words for that report it works as expected for me. I >> hope, btw., that we are using the same report because you do not mention the >> scrunched up lines in this report – which is a known bug!! >> >> I suggest that you try using the Reset Button on the right, near the >> bottom of the Report Screen and see if that does anything. I am puzzled by >> your statement: >> ”No.8 is slightly different and is missing part of the citation so bearing >> in mind what was mentioned about there being no variation I checked them >> again just in case and they are exactly the same;” >> On the face of it there is a confliction – how can they be exactly the >> same when there is a slight difference? >> >> Ron Ferguson >> http://www.fergys.co.uk/ >> >> >> >> >> *From:* Charlotte Box <[email protected]> >> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2011 11:33 PM >> *To:* [email protected] >> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] >> >> >> Ok, I thought I had been specific, however, I'm getting the same problem >> on the individual report and family report as these are the only reports >> currently using the citations. >> >> >> I have 1 record; a *statutory birth record*; >> I have cited it twice; once for an AKA, and once for the Birth; >> I added them by using the copy facility in Legacy so I knew they were >> exactly the same; >> On the 'Source Citation' page of the 'Individual Report' for example, the >> entry for the *statutory birth record* appears twice, numbered 7 & 8; >> The AKA cites No. 7, the birth cites No.8, I obviously only want it to >> appear once, i.e both pointing to no.7. >> No.8 is slightly different and is missing part of the citation so bearing >> in mind what was mentioned about there being no variation I checked them >> again just in case and they are exactly the same; >> >> It has me stumped. I'm meticulous about my data entry but I can't find any >> differences and there are definately only two references to this one source >> when I checked under 'Assigned Sources'. >> >> Hope this is clearer. >> >> >> >> On 31 May 2011 21:19, Ron Ferguson >> <mailto:[email protected]<[email protected]> >> > wrote: >> >>> Charlotte, >>> >>> Please keep in mind that when asking a question please be very specific >>> with details. You say a “report”, but the published detail for every report >>> is different, without knowing which no one can check your observation. I >>> can, therefore, only give a general answer. Provided that the source is on >>> the same page (if using the setting for them to appear at the bottom of each >>> page), or at the end of the report then the source will only appear once. >>> >>> However, it is essential that the Master Source and Source Detail are >>> *exactly* the same in all cases which includes spaces and carriage returns >>> etc.. If there is any difference, no matter how slight than it will be seen >>> as a different source. Without any other details for the type of report and >>> settings I haven’t a clue in your particular case. >>> >>> Ron Ferguson >>> http://www.fergys.co.uk/ >>> >>> >>> *From:* Kathy Meyer <[email protected]> >>> *Sent:* Tuesday, May 31, 2011 8:49 PM >>> *To:* [email protected] >>> *Subject:* Re: [LegacyUG] >>> >>> It probably is a basic question but since I haven't really used reports >>> a lot, I don't have any idea and I will be interested in seeing the replies >>> :-) Thanks for asking! My theory is that as long as it is Legacy related, >>> don't be afraid to ask. Kathy >>> >>> On Tue, May 31, 2011 at 1:33 PM, Charlotte Box < >>> [email protected]> wrote: >>> >>>> Hello everyone, >>>> >>>> Apologies if this question is a bit basic, and I'm sure there must be an >>>> easy solution so here goes. How do you stop a citation appearing in a >>>> report >>>> more than once, in this instance a statutory birth record I've used to >>>> evidence an AKA and the birth itself? >>>> >>>> Thanks! >>>> >>>> -- >>>> >>> Kathy Meyer >>> >>> >>> >>> >> > > Legacy User Group guidelines: > http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp > Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: > http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ > Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp > Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and > on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). > To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp > Legacy User Group guidelines: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Etiquette.asp Archived messages after Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Archived messages from old mail server - before Nov. 21 2009: http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/ Online technical support: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/Help.asp Follow Legacy on Facebook (http://www.facebook.com/LegacyFamilyTree) and on our blog (http://news.LegacyFamilyTree.com). To unsubscribe: http://www.LegacyFamilyTree.com/LegacyLists.asp
